What would you like to do?

In Academic IELTS Writing Task 1, you are given a visual — a chart, graph, table, process diagram, or map — and asked to describe the key features in at least 150 words in approximately 20 minutes. You are not asked for opinions or to explain why something happened. You simply describe what the data shows. Task 1 is worth one-third of your Writing band score.

🎯

Task Achievement

Did you address the task fully? Have you written 150+ words, included an overview, and selected the most significant features? Missing the overview caps you at Band 6 for this criterion.

Worth 25% of your Writing score
🔗

Coherence & Cohesion

Is your response logically organised? Does it flow well? Examiners look for clear paragraph structure, appropriate linking words (however, in contrast, similarly), and a logical sequence of ideas.

Worth 25% of your Writing score
📖

Lexical Resource

Do you use a variety of vocabulary accurately? Avoid repeating the same words ("increased", "showed"). Use synonyms, collocations, and precise language. Paraphrasing the prompt well is also assessed here.

Worth 25% of your Writing score
✏️

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Do you use a mix of sentence structures correctly? Simple sentences alone limit you to Band 5–6. To reach Band 7+, use complex sentences with relative clauses, passive voice, and varied tense forms.

Worth 25% of your Writing score
1

Introduction

Paraphrase the prompt. Say what the visual shows and the time period or location if given.

~25–30 words
2

Overview

2–3 sentences on the most striking trends or differences. No specific data — just the big picture.

~30–40 words
3

Body Paragraph 1

Describe the first key group of data with specific figures. Make comparisons.

~50–60 words
4

Body Paragraph 2

Describe the second key group of data. Highlight anything notable or surprising.

~50–60 words
The overview is the most important paragraph. Many students write an introduction and dive straight into data — missing the overview entirely. Examiners check for it immediately. Without an overview, Band 6 is the ceiling for Task Achievement.
Introduction

Paraphrase the prompt — do not copy it

Change the vocabulary and structure of the task question. If the prompt says "The chart shows the percentage of people who…", write "The bar chart illustrates the proportion of individuals who…". Never copy the prompt word for word — examiners subtract this from your word count.

Target: 25–30 words
Overview ⭐

Summarise the 2–3 most important things the data shows

No specific numbers here. Identify the biggest trend, the most notable comparison, or the most striking feature. Use phrases like: Overall, it is clear that… / In general, the most noticeable trend is… / It is evident that…

Target: 30–40 words
Body 1

Describe the first group of data with specific figures

Group related data together logically — for example, the two highest categories, or one time period. Always include specific numbers from the chart. Use comparative language: higher than, almost double, significantly more than, by contrast.

Target: 50–60 words
Body 2

Describe the second group — include anything surprising

Cover the remaining data. If there is anything unexpected or notable — an exception to a trend, a particularly high or low value — highlight it here. End with a sentence that draws the key comparison between Body 1 and Body 2.

Target: 50–60 words
📏

Write at least 150 words

Examiners count. Going under the limit automatically lowers your Task Achievement score — there is no way around this. 160–190 words is the ideal range.

🚫

Never give opinions or explain causes

Do not write "This may be because…" or "In my opinion…". You are describing what the data shows, not analysing why. Opinions are penalised in Task 1.

🔢

Always include specific data

Vague statements like "the numbers went up" score badly. Always support your descriptions with specific figures: "rose sharply from 20% to 45%", "the highest figure was 78,000".

⏱️

Spend no more than 20 minutes

Task 2 is worth twice as many marks. Most students spend too long on Task 1 and rush Task 2. Practise stopping at 20 minutes regardless of whether you feel finished.

📊

Select — don't describe everything

You cannot and should not describe every single data point. Choose the most significant features and group similar data together. The examiner wants to see that you can identify what matters.

🔄

Vary your language throughout

Using "increased" for every rise will hurt your Lexical Resource score. Vary between: rose, grew, climbed, surged, jumped, shot up — and fell, dropped, declined, decreased, plummeted, dipped.

🔗

Use linking words between data points

Connect your data smoothly: Similarly, by contrast, while, whereas, on the other hand, in comparison, meanwhile. Without these, your writing will feel like a list of numbers rather than an analysis.

✍️

Paraphrase the introduction — never copy

The introductory sentence should paraphrase the task question using different vocabulary. Copied text is not counted in your word total and signals poor lexical resource to the examiner.

2 mins
Analyse the visual & plan your overview
3 mins
Write introduction & overview paragraph
10 mins
Write body paragraphs with specific data
5 mins
Check grammar, vocabulary & word count
⏱️ Stop at 20 minutes — no exceptions. Task 2 is worth twice as many marks. Students who overrun on Task 1 rarely recover enough in Task 2 to compensate. Practise stopping with a timer.

Strategy

  • Identify the highest and lowest bars immediately — these form your overview
  • Group bars by category or time period in your body paragraphs
  • For grouped bar charts, compare the two sets of bars directly
  • Always specify the exact percentages or figures when making comparisons
  • Note whether bars show absolute numbers or percentages — use the right language

Common mistakes

  • Describing every single bar rather than grouping and comparing
  • Forgetting to include specific figures to support descriptions
  • Using the same verb ("increased") for every bar

Key language

the highest figure was accounted for X% significantly higher than almost double roughly similar to by contrast while X stood at the lowest was recorded in in comparison the gap between X and Y notably at approximately

Strategy

  • Overview: identify the largest and smallest segments immediately
  • Group segments — largest to smallest, or by category (e.g. renewable vs non-renewable)
  • If two pie charts are shown (comparing two time periods), compare each segment across both
  • Always use percentage language — "accounted for", "made up", "comprised", "represented"
  • Note if any segments are roughly equal in size — this is worth mentioning

Common mistakes

  • Simply listing all the percentages without making comparisons
  • Forgetting to group data — just going clockwise around the chart
  • Not summing related categories ("together, X and Y accounted for 55%")

Key language

accounted for made up comprised represented the largest share the smallest proportion together, X and Y almost a third just over half slightly more than in contrast the combined total

Strategy

  • Identify overall trends first — rising, falling, fluctuating, stable
  • Note the starting and ending points for each line
  • Identify any peaks, troughs, or points where lines cross
  • For multiple lines, group in body paragraphs by trend similarity
  • Use specific years and figures at key turning points

Common mistakes

  • Describing every small fluctuation rather than the overall trend
  • Forgetting to mention where lines start and end
  • Ignoring crossover points where two lines meet

Key language — trends

rose steadily fell sharply fluctuated remained stable peaked at reached a low of levelled off saw a gradual decline surged dipped slightly overtook before recovering to

Strategy

  • Scan the whole table first — find the overall highest and lowest values
  • Look for cross-column patterns — not just within columns
  • Group rows by similarity in body paragraphs
  • Highlight any unexpected relationships (e.g. long hours but low pay)
  • Do not describe every cell — select the most significant data

Common mistakes

  • Simply reading across each row without making comparisons
  • Ignoring notable relationships between columns
  • Using the same comparative structure for every comparison

Key language

the highest figure the lowest recorded in comparison significantly more than almost three times a notable exception interestingly despite having compared to while X had the highest the gap between considerably lower than

Strategy

  • Count the stages before writing — mention the total in your introduction
  • Use passive voice throughout: "the water is filtered", "sludge is removed"
  • Cover every stage — unlike charts, all stages must be described
  • Mention any by-products or loops in the cycle
  • Use sequencing language to link each stage clearly

Common mistakes

  • Using active voice ("workers filter the water") instead of passive
  • Skipping stages — every step must be included
  • Forgetting to mention by-products or end uses

Key sequencing language

the process begins with in the first stage subsequently following this once X has been completed at this point this is then finally is passed through is converted into is extracted the cycle is complete

Strategy

  • Organise by zone — describe changes in the north, then south, for example
  • Use change verbs: replaced by, converted into, demolished, extended, retained, constructed
  • Note what stayed the same as well as what changed
  • For two maps, compare each area between the two time periods
  • Mention location of each change precisely — do not just say "a building was added"

Common mistakes

  • Randomly listing changes without logical grouping by location
  • Forgetting to mention things that did not change
  • Vague location language ("somewhere in the middle")

Key location & change language

to the north of in the top-left corner adjacent to replaced by converted into demolished remained unchanged was constructed extended to the east a new X was built where X once stood in the southern part
Missing overview
The bar chart shows concert attendance in 2010 and 2015. In 2010, the 16–24 group had 40%…
Overall, concert attendance increased across all age groups between 2010 and 2015, with younger people consistently attending more frequently than older groups.
Copying the prompt
The chart below shows the percentage of people in different age groups who visited music concerts between 2010 and 2015.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of individuals across six age groups who attended music concerts over a five-year period from 2010 to 2015.
No specific figures
The 16–24 age group had the highest attendance, while the 65+ group had the lowest. Both changed over the period.
The 16–24 age group had the highest attendance at 50% in 2015, up from 40% in 2010, while the 65+ group recorded the lowest at just 5% in 2010, rising to 15% by 2015.
Giving opinions or reasons
This may be because older people have less disposable income. In my opinion, the government should invest more in making concerts accessible.
Overall, attendance grew most significantly among older age groups, though younger people remained the most frequent concert-goers throughout the period.
Repeating the same verb
The figures increased from 20% to 45%. They also increased in the next category. All categories increased.
The figures rose from 20% to 45%. The next category climbed from 15% to 38%, while the remaining groups also saw steady growth throughout the period.
Too short — under 150 words
Writing only 120–140 words and leaving the response underdeveloped — often because the student runs out of things to say.
Add more specific comparisons, mention starting and ending points, and sum related categories together ("together, X and Y accounted for 65% of the total").
Bar Chart
Pie Chart
Line Graph
Table
Process Diagram
Map
1

Music Concert Attendance by Age Group

Bar Chart
≈ Band 7.5
Task 1 Prompt

The chart below shows the percentage of people in different age groups who visited music concerts between 2010 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Bar chart showing music concert attendance by age group 2010-2015
— colour-codes each paragraph by function

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of individuals across six age groups who attended music concerts in 2010 and in 2015.

Overall, concert attendance rose across every age group over the five-year period. Younger age groups consistently recorded the highest attendance in both years, while the most striking proportional increases were seen among the two oldest groups.

In both years, the 16–24 age group had the highest attendance, rising from 40% in 2010 to 50% in 2015. The 25–34 group followed a similar upward trend, increasing from 30% to 35%. Attendance in the 35–44 and 45–54 groups also grew moderately — from 25% to 30% and from 20% to 25% respectively — meaning all four younger cohorts saw a rise of 5–10 percentage points.

By contrast, the two oldest groups experienced far more dramatic relative gains. Attendance among 55–64 year-olds doubled from 10% to 20%, while the 65+ group saw an even more notable rise, tripling from just 5% to 15%. Despite these significant increases, older age groups still attended far less frequently than younger people, with the 65+ figure in 2015 (15%) remaining lower than the 35–44 figure in 2010 (25%).

✓ Band 7.5 features: clear paraphrase in the introduction; a specific, data-free overview that identifies two separate trends; body paragraphs grouped logically (younger vs older cohorts); varied comparative language; and a closing sentence that draws a meaningful cross-group comparison rather than merely restating data.
2

Energy Sources for Electricity Generation

Pie Chart
≈ Band 7.0
Task 1 Prompt

The pie chart below shows the distribution of energy sources used to generate electricity in a country in 2022. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Pie chart showing energy sources for electricity generation 2022
— colour-codes each paragraph by function

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of different energy sources used to generate electricity in a country in 2022.

Overall, coal was the most significant contributor to electricity generation, accounting for 35% of the total energy supply. This was closely followed by natural gas, which made up 30% of the energy mix. Together, these two non-renewable sources represented a substantial 65% of the country's electricity production.

Nuclear energy was the third-largest contributor, providing 20% of the total. While it is not a fossil fuel, it still plays a critical role in the country's energy strategy. Renewable sources, including solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, contributed 10% of the total energy output. Despite growing global awareness of renewable energy, this percentage remains relatively small compared to non-renewable sources.

Finally, other energy sources not specified in the chart made up just 5% of the electricity generation, indicating that less conventional sources had a minor impact on overall production.

✓ Band 7.0 features: clear paraphrase, strong grouping of non-renewables (coal + gas = 65%), and good use of percentage language throughout. To push toward 7.5, the overview could identify a second key feature (e.g. the small share of renewables) and the conclusion could be cut — Task 1 does not require a summary paragraph.
3

International Students in Three Countries

Line Graph
≈ Band 7.5
Task 1 Prompt

The line graph below shows the number of international students in three different countries (Country A, Country B, and Country C) between 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Line graph showing international students in three countries 2010-2020
— colour-codes each paragraph by function

The line graph illustrates the number of international students studying in three different countries — Country A, Country B, and Country C — over a ten-year period from 2010 to 2020.

Overall, the number of international students increased in all three countries, although at different rates. Country A experienced a steady and consistent rise, while Country B's numbers fluctuated slightly throughout the period. Country C saw a rapid increase in the first few years, which then levelled off toward the end of the period.

In 2010, the number of international students in all three countries started at around the same level — approximately 20,000. However, by 2020, the number in Country A had risen steadily to reach around 80,000. Country B's figures showed fluctuations, rising to about 50,000 by 2015, dropping slightly in 2017, and then reaching 60,000 by 2020.

Country C experienced a sharp increase from 20,000 to about 70,000 between 2010 and 2015, after which the number plateaued and remained at around the same level until 2020. Despite all three beginning at the same point, Country A ultimately recorded the highest number of students by 2020, narrowly ahead of Country C.

✓ Band 7.5 features: starting and ending points clearly stated for all three lines; body paragraphs grouped logically; peaks, plateaus, and fluctuations all identified; and the final sentence draws a meaningful end-point comparison rather than merely repeating the overview.
4

Working Hours & Salaries Across Five Professions

Table
≈ Band 7.5
Task 1 Prompt

The table below shows the average weekly working hours and average annual salaries for five different professions in a European country in 2023. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average Working Hours & Annual Salaries by Profession (2023) Profession Avg. Weekly Hours Avg. Annual Salary (€) Software Engineer 42 78,000 Nurse 38 36,000 Teacher 35 42,000 Lawyer 52 95,000 Chef 50 28,000 Source: National Labour Statistics Office, 2023
— colour-codes each paragraph by function

The table presents data on the average weekly working hours and annual salaries for five professions in a European country in 2023.

Overall, lawyers earned the highest salaries but also worked the longest hours, while chefs worked comparably long hours for significantly lower pay. Teachers worked the fewest hours per week, though their salary was mid-range among the professions listed.

In terms of earnings, lawyers received the highest annual salary at €95,000, followed by software engineers at €78,000. Teachers earned €42,000 per year, placing them in the middle of the salary range. Nurses received €36,000, while chefs earned the least at just €28,000.

Regarding working hours, lawyers also topped the list at 52 hours per week, closely followed by chefs at 50 hours. Software engineers worked 42 hours per week, and nurses worked 38 hours. Teachers had the shortest working week at 35 hours. Notably, chefs worked almost as many hours as lawyers but earned less than a third of the lawyer's salary, highlighting a striking disparity between hours worked and financial compensation across these professions.

✓ Band 7.5 features: two-trend overview identifying both a pattern (high hours = high pay) and a notable exception (chefs); body paragraphs grouped by column rather than listed row-by-row; cross-column comparison in the final sentence that adds genuine analytical insight.
5

The Water Recycling Process

Process Diagram
≈ Band 7.5
Task 1 Prompt

The diagram below illustrates the process by which wastewater is treated and recycled for reuse. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The Water Recycling Process STEP 1 Collection Sewers & drains STEP 2 Screening Removes solids STEP 3 Sedimentation Solids settle out STEP 4 Biological Treatment STEP 5 Disinfection Chlorine / UV STEP 6 Clean Water Released / reused By-product handling Sludge (from Step 3) Dried → agricultural fertiliser Biogas (from Step 4) Captured → electricity generation Simplified overview of a standard municipal wastewater treatment cycle
— colour-codes each paragraph by function

The diagram illustrates the six-stage process through which wastewater is treated and made safe for release or reuse, along with the handling of two by-products generated during the process.

Overall, the treatment cycle moves from raw sewage collection through progressively more refined purification stages before producing clean water, with useful materials extracted at two intermediate points.

The process begins with the collection of wastewater from sewers and drains, which is then transported to a treatment facility. In the second stage, screening removes large solid objects from the water. The water then undergoes sedimentation in step three, during which smaller solid particles sink to the bottom and form sludge. This sludge is removed, dried, and converted into agricultural fertiliser — one of the two main by-products of the process.

In step four, biological treatment uses microorganisms to break down organic matter in the water. This stage produces biogas, which is captured and used to generate electricity, thus making the process partially self-sustaining. The partially treated water then passes through disinfection in step five, where chlorine or ultraviolet light eliminates remaining pathogens. Finally, in step six, the clean water is either released into the environment or recycled for reuse.

✓ Band 7.5 features: introduction states the number of stages and mentions by-products; a genuine overview identifies the overall direction of the process; body paragraphs use passive voice throughout; every stage is covered; by-products are explicitly linked to the stages that produce them.
6

Changes to a Town Centre: 2000 vs 2024

Map
≈ Band 7.5
Task 1 Prompt

The maps below show the layout of a town centre in 2000 and in 2024. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Riverside Town Centre — 2000 vs 2024 2000 RIVER High Street Factory (industrial) Car Park (open) Market (outdoor) Shops (small, local) Empty land 2024 RIVER High Street (pedestrianised) Housing (residential) Multi-storey Car Park Shopping Centre Shops (renovated) Public Park (new green space) Demolished/replaced New construction Formerly empty land
— colour-codes each paragraph by function

The two maps illustrate how the layout of Riverside town centre changed between 2000 and 2024.

Overall, the town underwent significant redevelopment over this period, with a clear shift from industrial and underused spaces toward residential, commercial, and recreational facilities.

The most striking change in the northern part of the town was the demolition of the factory in the top-left area, which was replaced by a residential housing complex. The open car park in the centre of this zone was upgraded to a multi-storey car park, presumably to accommodate the higher population density. The outdoor market in the top-right corner was also removed to make way for a large enclosed shopping centre.

In the southern part of the town, the small local shops along the High Street were retained but renovated. The High Street itself was pedestrianised by 2024, suggesting an effort to reduce traffic and improve the area for pedestrians. Most notably, the large area of empty land that had occupied the south-central and south-eastern portions of the town in 2000 was transformed into a public park, providing residents with a green recreational space.

✓ Band 7.5 features: clear paraphrase without copying the prompt; overview identifies the overarching theme of change without listing specific details; body paragraphs organised logically by zone (north then south); precise location language throughout; change verbs varied (demolished, replaced, upgraded, pedestrianised, retained, transformed).
⏱️ 20-Minute Exam Timer

Task 1 Timed Writing Practice

Choose a prompt below, then start the 20-minute timer. Write your response in the box — aim for 150–190 words. When time is up (or you finish early), you'll see your word count, time taken, and a self-check list to review your work.

Choose a prompt
📊 Bar Chart
Music Concert Attendance by Age Group
The chart shows the percentage of people in different age groups who visited music concerts between 2010 and 2015.
🥧 Pie Chart
Energy Sources for Electricity Generation
The chart shows the distribution of energy sources used to generate electricity in a country in 2022.
📈 Line Graph
International Students in Three Countries
The graph shows the number of international students in three countries between 2010 and 2020.
📋 Table
Working Hours & Salaries Across Five Professions
The table shows average weekly working hours and annual salaries for five professions in a European country in 2023.
⚙️ Process Diagram
The Water Recycling Process
The diagram illustrates the process by which wastewater is treated and recycled for reuse.
🗺️ Map
Changes to a Town Centre: 2000 vs 2024
The maps show the layout of a town centre in 2000 and in 2024.
Task 1 Prompt — Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Time remaining
20:00
Word count
0 words
Quick phrases: Intro opener Overview starter In contrast By comparison Rose sharply Accounted for Remained stable
✍️

Time's up — well done!

Here's how your practice session went. Review your response against the checklist below.

Words written
Time taken
150
Word target

Self-check — did you…

Write at least 150 words?
Paraphrase the prompt (not copy it) in your introduction?
Include a clear overview paragraph (no specific figures)?
Support descriptions with specific data from the visual?
Make comparisons rather than just listing figures?
Vary your vocabulary (not repeating the same verbs)?
Avoid giving opinions or explaining causes?
Tip: copy your response and compare it paragraph by paragraph against a model answer of the same visual type. Look at how the overview is constructed and how data is grouped.
Also worth reading
✍️ Ready to practise?

Put your Task 1 skills to the test

Use our timed writing practice to write a Task 1 response under exam conditions — aim for 150–190 words in 20 minutes. Then challenge yourself with a Task 2 essay.